Informacja o cookies
Korzystamy z plików cookies w celach statystycznych i umożliwienia funkcjonowania serwisu.
Uznajemy, że jeżeli kontynuujesz korzystanie z serwisu, wyrażasz na to zgodę.
Informacje o możliwości zmiany ustawień cookies »
Zgadzam się, zamknij X
Toyota Celica '94 ST205 GT-Four (390PS) Zdjęcia z ostatniej rundy SuperOES w Kielcach

Zdjęcia z ostatniej rundy SuperOES w Kielcach

2014-06-05 22:33:57

Filmik był, teraz kilka zdjęć :)


Dag nabbit good stuff you wheepprsnappirs!
My proelbm was a wall until I read this, then I smashed it.
Para FMS"E chamas a essa recusa exercício de inteligência. Empenhas-te tanto em desfazer o que está feito, que acabarás por dar cabo do teu bem mais precioso: o sentido das coisas (...). De destruição em destruição, vais deslizando até à vaidade (...). Na falta de um outro sentido, terás de ir buscar o sentido a ti próprio. E só tu ficas a colorir as coisas com a tua pálida luz (...) no meio do teu deserto, terás de te mostrar satisfeito contigo próprio, porque fora de ti não há nenhuma outra coisa. Aí te temos condenado a gritar «eu, eu, eu...». No vazio. E ninguém te re.eondps"Saint Exupéry
I think you have to read the above post together with the other post I have on the sujebct. Compulsory religious studies in my Catholic School years was only given as an example of brainwashing school curriculum. There are other examples of compulsory study materials given in the other posts. Let me post all of them here:Excuse me for writing in English. The Chinese software in my computer is not working properly. I also apologize for not noticing the difference between 伊利沙伯中學國民教育舊生關注組 and伊中舊生會.The purpose of my message is not to judge the value of 國民教育, and even less do I dare to suggest our beloved school to accept or reject the program. The purpose of my message is to make the point that: “With so many voices opposing the National Education program, do we really realize that we have already received a large number of indoctrinations during our school years? If we do, why do we single out our objection on the National Education program and passively accept others?”The answer has been partly provided by the very eloquent message of Mr Well Lee: “It is not the indoctrination process in education to which one objects; rather it is the content of the doctrine which decides one’s choice.” This, however, immediately leads to the next question: “Who is best to be the judge of the content of the education material?” In my view, hopefully, we have a sensible Education Department which may make the “unbiased” decision by following the national and international history as well as development trends. A fair and unbiased decision may still not be possible since “fairness” and “biasness” are relative terms. Then, is following the majority always right? Not necessarily! (Not long ago, some schools in southern USA chose to abandon the teaching of Darwin’s Evolution due to pressure from the majority of the parents and the outcries of extreme religious groups.)In describing the National Education program, it was mentioned 內容偏頗﹐反倫理﹐是非顛倒”, and the term “荼毒” was also used. I have not studied the program content, therefore, I cannot pronounce, in my own opinion, on the suitability of the National Education program in school education. However, I remember through my personal experience of the primary and secondary schools in Hong Kong, there were quite a few occasions in which official text-books (as well as teachers) showed complexion which suits those words of description. The religious classes I had (mentioned in my last message) could be cited as examples; the massacres of hundreds of thousands of Muslims, Jews and Eastern Christians in Jerusalem in 1099 was (and probably still is) described in history books as “holy” and we were supposed to worship such “wars”; the infamous Opium War caused by drug smuggling and drug pushing by the East India Co. was taught to us as “the Chinese needing British goods”; the rule of the great British Empire was always glorified while the atrocities committed by her troops to the natives in Africa, Australia, N. America and the Middle East were dismissed as “disciplining the savage”. The above are just a few examples in a multitude. However, I must admit that, in many of the “civilized” countries I visited, such education materials of glorifying one country’s past while downplaying (or even omitting) its atrocities can be commonly found in schools – Japan, USA, UK, Israel, France, (and even Canada!), etc. Due to the stand of the colonial Hong Kong Government in the past, such biased materials were approved for education and have infiltrated our text-books and schools. Somehow, we accepted them – no protest!In the eve of sending out a petition, I like to ask ourselves to sit back and consider this analytically, “Is the content of the National Education program that much worse than the materials I have cited? If so, please go ahead and protest! If not, singling out the National Education program as a target of protest will be infringing on ‘double-standard’”.Yours truly,Max Wong
Thank you , Steve, for posting the arclite. In general I was, however, disappointed by the arclite. There were nice points; that I do not dispute. However, it appears to me that if a Christian does not have a broad Christian/Biblical World View, the whole arclite makes no real sense. Without a solid Biblical Worldview the Believer will have to guess at and piece together a seemingly endless amount of variables in politics, ethics, economics etc. in order to make a decision on how to vote in a God honoring way. Here's a simple example:A casual chess player who looks at a Master level game in progress will probably see so many possibilities that he HAS to guess at what move to make or be paralyzed by indecision. This is similar to a Believer with no clearly understood Biblical World View.Just as a learned and experienced chess player however, can AT A GLANCE get a good understanding of what is happening on the chess board, and proceed with some certainty and direction, so can a Believer cut through the complexity (and deceit) of the political process IF he has a Biblical World View formed by applying the Word of God as guide and authority. I believe it is usually quite easy for a Believer with a solid Biblical World View to see through the fog of politics at a glance and vote in a God honoring way. In my opinion the arclite did to little share a Biblical World View and hence may have added more variables (and confusion) to the election process!!I believe it's the responsibility of the Local Church to convey, by teaching and exhortation, a broad God honoring Biblical World View to Gods people. I also believe that if the Local Church fails to lead by the Spirit in this area, our Republic will truly suffer and we will all to often be found unintentionally aiding the enemy!
I really loved reidnag your blog. It was very well authored and easy to undertand. Unlike additional blogs I have read which are really not tht good. I also found your entries very interesting. In fact after reidnag, I had to go show it to my friend and he ejoyed it as well!